创新举措独特优势打动企业 19家企业总部迁到武汉
Background
[edit]Currently commons separates SVG images from other images, see for example Category:SVG flags and Category:Flags. It was proposed elsewhere to change this.
Arguments for moving SVG files into respective main topic categories:
- make files easier to find
- avoid maintaining 2 or more parallel cat structures
- whether a file is SVG or not is sufficiently well visible on the extension
Catches:
- categories for language-neutral SVG:s and multilanguage SVG:s should remain, since it is NOT visibile on the extension or anywhere whether a SVG file maybe is language-neutral or multilanguage or not
- there are other non-subject features possibly worth categorization (videos without sound, animated GIF:s PNG:s WEBP:s, ...)
Questions:
- Should the categories for SVG such as Category:SVG flags only get hidden, or completely deleted?
Taylor 49 (talk) 00:27, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Darn. While you drafted this RfC, I drafted a CfD: Commons:Categories for discussion/2025/02/Category:SVG by subject. --Enyavar (talk) 01:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49 and Enyavar: Copying my comment from the CFD, I don't have much issues with deleting SVG categories beyond "Level 2". But the main problem I see is the potential overcrowding of categories like Category:SVG maps of India, for which I suggest to add the {{CategoryTOC}} template. I've also crafted a template at User:Sbb1413/sandbox for automatic categorization of SVG files into appropriate categories. Sbb1413 (he) (talk ? contribs ? uploads) 11:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)